
Sustainability
Report 2024
Mining to empower people
and advance societies
VIEW
from the top
Messages from AngloGold Ashanti leadership
-
Message from the Chairperson of the Social, Ethics and Sustainability Committee
Bruce CleaverREAD MESSAGE: Message from the Chairperson of the Social, Ethics and Sustainability Committee -
-
Message from the Chief Sustainability and Corporate Affairs Officer
Stewart BaileyREAD MESSAGE: Message from the Chief Sustainability and Corporate Affairs Officer

2024
at a glance

Creating
value
Revenue*
$5.8bn
(2023: $4.6bn)
Gold production*
2.66Moz
(2023: 2.64Moz)
Gold Mineral Reserve*
31.2Moz
(2023: 28.1Moz)
Acquisition of Centamin completed in November 2024
- * Includes Centamin
- **Excludes Centamin

Empowering
people
People employed*
39,484
employees and contractors
(2023: 33,658)
Total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR)**
0.97
(2023:1.09)
Salaries, wages and benefits paid to employees*
$584m
(2023: $551m)
Training and development expenditure**
$7.99m
(2023: $7.76m)

Empowering our
communities
Community investment**
$20.56m
(2023: $18.84m)
Expenditure with local suppliers**
$4.26bn
(92%)
(2023: $4.31bn (94%))
Grievances resolved**
93%
(2023: 92%)

Caring for our
environment
Reportable environmental incidents**
1
(2023: 1)
Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions**
1.473Mt
(2023: 1,469Mt)
Cumulative amount of land rehabilitated**
4,271ha
(2023: 4.104ha)
Renewable energy supply**
6.3%
(2023: 6.6%)

Ensuring best
practice governance
Employees that completed ethics training**
5,697
(2023: 1,444)
Security personnel trained on human rights policies**
100%
(2023: 99.92%)
Payments to government**
$1.034bn
(2023: $833m)
Refer to ESG Data Workbook for breakdown
Our approach
At AngloGold Ashanti, our approach to
sustainability stems from and is guided by
our purpose: Mining to empower people
and societies.
Our approach encompasses:
- Following our North Star โ our Purpose and Values underpin every decision we make and action we take
- Engaging with our stakeholders with respect, consistency, clarity and understanding
- Ensuring we monitor and manage our performance against our targets, that our systems and processes are subject to assurance, and that we communicate our approach and performance on material matters regularly and transparently
- Securing our social licence to operate by making a positive impact today, and leaving a lasting legacy.
Materiality and material sustainability issues
The Company’s double materiality assessment is integrated into the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework by incorporating both financial materiality (impact on the Company’s financial performance) and environmental and social materiality (impact on the environment and society). This ensure that the Company considers a comprehensive view of risks and opportunities that may affect not only its financial outcomes but also it’s broader societal and environmental responsibilities.
Our process follows the ‘double materiality’ framework.
Phase 1:
Context
This involved a thorough review of potential material sustainability issues, drawing on insights from peer reporting, alignment with current and emerging disclosure standards, and feedback from ratings agencies. This approach ensured the issues considered were relevant, comprehensive, and reflective of both industry best practices and stakeholder expectations. This review resulted in an initial list of material sustainability issues, which was carefully refined to identify the 17 issues most pertinent to our industry and sector.
Phase 2:
Discovery of impact
In this phase we undertook interviews with 11 external and 20 internal stakeholders to identify material sustainability issues. These included:
- External stakeholders: investors, market analysts, media and an industry body
- Internal stakeholders: Board, Executive management and Senior leadership
This process resulted in the identification of 36 potential material sustainability issues that influence our ability to create, sustain, or potentially erode social, environmental, and economic value from both an impact and financial materiality perspective.
Phase 3:
Ranking
Finally, members of executive and senior management were asked to rank issues from the perspective of both impact and financial materiality, based on our definitions (alongside). Respondents were also asked to indicate the time horizon โ short, medium and long term โ associated with impacts and, for financial materiality, whether the issue was primarily a risk or an opportunity.
These issues were then reviewed by the internal sustainability team. The ranking was adjusted to reflect broader industry sustainability issues and issues raised by stakeholders.
The final list of 14 material sustainability issues was reviewed and ratified by the SES Committee and Board.
Our commitments
Case studies
Assurance
External charters and indices
We subscribe to a number of external principles,
charters and standards that rank our ESG and reporting performance, according to their own methodologies



